In-Call Control of Ancillary Systems with Asterisk

Bogen Analog Door Phone
Bogen ADP1


After setting up a doorphone at my front door on a ringdown circuit that calls me in various locations when it goes off-hook, it occurred to me that if my front door had an electric strike plate, I could remotely release the door using Asterisk.

Not having such a strike plate, I decided to have Asterisk control the electric garage door opener instead.  The garage door is near enough the front door to serve basically the same purpose as an electric door striker.

One could, of course, control anything, all the way up to full home automation.  Perhaps I'll buy an electric strike plate, they don't seem terribly expensive, although I have no idea how good these are.

The Asterisk configuration is straightforward and involves the specification of a dynamic feature in features.conf.  In the [applicationmap] section, I've defined these two dynamic features:

doorcontrol-caller => 5,self/caller,AGI,doorcontrol
doorcontrol-callee => 6,self/callee,AGI,doorcontrol

In the context the door phone is in, I enable the version of this dynamic feature that can only be initiated by the callee:

exten => s,n,Set(DYNAMIC_FEATURES=doorcontrol-callee)

In the context I use to call the doorphone (it auto-answers), I enable the version of this dynamic feature that can only be initiated by the caller:

exten => 1109,n,Set(DYNAMIC_FEATURES=doorcontrol-caller)

This way, one cannot take the doorphone off-hook and send the '6' with a portable DTMF encoder, only the far end can trigger the doorcontrol AGI script, regardless of whether the doorphone initiated the call or not.  Unfortunately, two dynamic features cannot share the same activation code, even if they are used separately.  This is mildly annoying since it means if I call the doorphone, I have to use an activation code that is different (as you can see, I've selected '5') than the code I use when the doorphone calls me.

The doorcontrol script is just a bit of PERL that uses Scott Penrose's Device::ParallelPort module to manipulate the D0 line on the parallel port:

#!/usr/bin/perl -w

use Device::ParallelPort;

my $port = Device::ParallelPort->new('parport:0');

$port->set_bit(0, 1);    # set D0 high/on
sleep 1;                 # wait one second
$port->set_bit(0, 0);    # set D0 low/off

The Device::ParallelPort module requires a /dev/parportX device node.  I had hoped to get this working with an outboard USB parallel port interface so that I wouldn't risk damaging the parallel interface on my motherboard due to a wiring or hardware fault but wasn't able to figure out how to properly manipulate the data lines on a /dev/usblpX device (the ioctl call seems to hang when it should exit, perhaps looking for an ACK strobe?), if you know how to do this, I'd be interested in an email to my firstname @ my lastname dot com (see the bottom of this page for my name).  If you compile your own kernel, you'll have to include Parallel port supportIEEE 1284 transfer modes, and Support for user-space parallel port device drivers (under Character devices) to get parallel port support with /dev/parportX device nodes needed by Device::ParallelPort.

Once this is done, you'll need a hardware interface.  I happened to have an extra Clare LBA120 solid-state relay in my parts bin.  The Clare solid-state relays are great because you can drive them right off your TTL data lines without need of a buffer since they only draw 5mA, which even the most anemic of parallel ports should be able to source.  Not that I have anything against buffers, but since the parallel port has no +5 line with which to power one, you'd have to pull power from a USB port or some other such place.  The Clares let you keep the complexity (and spaghetti) to a minimum.

The LBA120 is one Form A relay and one Form B relay operating independently in one 8-pin DIP.  One is normally-open, and one is normally-closed.  I tied both of the LBA120's control cathodes (pins 2 and 4) to the ground on the parallel port's pin 19 through a 1k-Ohm resistor to limit parallel port current draw to a maximum of 5mA.  The normally-open relay's control anode (pin 3) is tied to D0 (the parallel port's pin 2) through the normally-closed relay.  The normally-closed relay's control anode (pin 1) is tied to  D1 (the parallel port's pin 3).  By using the normally-closed contacts to gate the control of the normally-open contacts, any common-mode blips in the parallel port data lines, which are typical when a system is shutting down or performing a POST, will not cause any false triggering of your external system.  We wouldn't want a reboot or power-cycle to operate the door.  Note that you never have to set D1 as long as your system comes up with it set low/off.  If your system boots with D1 high, you'll have to set it low in the PERL script.  Of course, if you're sure your system will never send any spurious TTL high signals to D0, you could simplify this by not using the normally-closed relay at all.

My garage door opener presents 24V to the control switch in my garage and runs 30mA through its closed contacts.  This is well within the limits of the LBA120 (170mA at 250V).  The switches in the LBA120 introduce about 8.5 ohms resistance, this shouldn't be a problem though, since garage door control buttons tend to be at the end of sometimes long runs of relatively thin wire, so an opener won't be looking for a near-zero-ohm contact closure.

The LBA120 can be had from Mouser Electronics.

Schematic Diagram


Here are a couple of images of the built circuit.  It fits easily into a standard D shell.  Yeah, I know that's an 18-pin DIP socket.  I couldn't find my DIP socket junk box and my local Radio Shack is badly stocked.  The 18-pin actually turned out to work very well, since it fit perfectly between the screw posts.


Image of circuit in D-shell

The connection between IC pins 3 and 7 consists of bent socket pins and a little solder bridge.

The other side (yeah, I got rosin all over the socket, it's better than using too little and ending up with dry connections.)

underside


Here's some video of it in action.


Last updated February 16, 2008 by Mark Rudholm